emed pedography platforms are accurate electronic systems for recording and evaluating pressure distribution under the foot in static and dynamic conditions. The platforms provide accurate, reliable information for the analysis of foot function and diagnosis of foot pathologies. Foot deformities and malfunctions can be detected during analysis of the barefoot pressure data.
The emed systems belong to the family of novel pedography measurement platforms. All scientific emed platforms operate with calibrated capacitive sensors.
Pedography is a functional diagnostic tool. The pedography analysis can be done within 8 minutes.
The emed platforms are compliant with the European Regulations on Medical Devices. This is extremely important for their use in clinical settings. A simple CE mark without a notified body is not sufficient as it can stand only for low distortion but not for safety and reliability.
The emed measuring software controls the emed platform and collects and displays the plantar pressure data of the foot. Different levels of emed measuring software are available.
are available in two sizes. Please find below the technical specifications of the emed-s and emed-xl:
 |  |
|
|
|
|
All platforms measure accurate, calibrated pressure, force, and contact area.
Additionally, the emed-xl collects spatiotemporal parameters.
_________________
*ZAS: Zero at start
The emed system is a valuable tool in orthopedic diagnostics, providing detailed insights into foot pressure and gait mechanics. For example, it can detect abnormal pressure patterns in flatfoot (pes planus), where the arch support is lacking, leading to a more uniform pressure distribution. Conversely, in high arches (pes cavus), pressure is concentrated on the heel and forefoot.
Additionally, the system identifies gait irregularities such as overpronation and supination, where the foot rolls inward or outward excessively during movement. This helps clinicians address biomechanical issues that may lead to chronic injuries.
In diabetic patients, early detection of high-pressure areas is vital to prevent foot ulcers. The emed system offers precise pressure mapping, enabling healthcare professionals to identify and monitor these areas effectively. This facilitates timely interventions, such as custom orthotics, to redistribute pressure and mitigate ulcer risk.
Athletes benefit from the emed system’s ability to analyze foot pressure during dynamic activities. By identifying abnormal pressure distributions and gait patterns, the system aids in optimizing performance and preventing injuries through tailored training programs and corrective measures.
In post-surgical care, the emed system is invaluable for evaluating recovery and guiding rehabilitation. It monitors changes in pressure distribution and weight-bearing after procedures, helping clinicians assess whether the healing process is progressing as expected.
For instance, it can identify if patients are placing excessive pressure on an operated foot, allowing adjustments to therapy or activity levels. This detailed feedback ensures that patients follow their rehabilitation protocols effectively, reducing the risk of complications and enhancing recovery outcomes.
The emed system is especially useful for diagnosing foot-related issues in children. It detects developmental abnormalities like pediatric flatfoot by analyzing pressure distributions and identifying the absence of an arch. This early detection allows for timely interventions, such as orthotics or physiotherapy, to correct the condition before it leads to long-term complications.
Additionally, it can analyze gait abnormalities like toe-walking or uneven strides, providing actionable insights for tailored treatments that promote healthy foot development.
In rheumatologic care, the emed system provides crucial insights into how joint inflammation affects foot biomechanics. For example, in arthritis or rheumatoid foot deformities, the system captures changes in pressure distribution caused by joint damage. This data helps clinicians recommend appropriate interventions, such as supportive orthotics or specific therapies, to alleviate pain and improve mobility.
By tailoring treatments to the patient’s unique needs, the emed system enhances the overall quality of care.
For patients with neurological conditions like peripheral neuropathy or Parkinson’s disease, the emed system detects imbalances and abnormal pressure patterns. In neuropathy, the system helps identify areas of uneven weight distribution that increase the risk of falls.
For Parkinson’s patients, it can track gait changes, such as shuffling or asymmetry, providing valuable data for designing gait training programs and fall prevention strategies. These insights contribute significantly to improving patient safety and mobility.
As people age, foot deformities like metatarsalgia or hammer toes become more common, often leading to pain and mobility issues. The emed system identifies pressure distribution changes associated with these conditions, helping clinicians design interventions to alleviate discomfort.
It also assesses fall risks by highlighting imbalances in weight distribution and gait, allowing for targeted solutions like balance training or orthotic support to enhance the quality of life for elderly patients.
Custom orthotics rely on precise pressure distribution data, which the emed system provides in detail. This information ensures that insoles or footwear are tailored to redistribute pressure effectively, addressing pain and correcting biomechanical issues.
Whether for sports injuries, diabetic ulcers, or general foot discomfort, the system helps create orthotic solutions that enhance comfort and functionality, improving patient outcomes.
Obesity often causes abnormal weight distribution, leading to increased pressure on specific foot areas, which can result in pain and structural deformities. The emed system maps these stress points, guiding interventions like weight redistribution insoles or targeted physiotherapy.
It also tracks how gait changes with weight loss, helping clinicians monitor progress and adapt treatment plans accordingly.
These applications demonstrate the emed system’s versatility and effectiveness in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and patient care across various medical fields.
Publication years 1989–2026 · Journal articles only
Browse original journal research reporting emed measurements or analysis of emed data. Click an application tag to see related papers, or search by title, author, journal or DOI.
Select one or more applications; articles must match every selected tag.
No records match these filters. Remove a tag or reset the filters to broaden the view.
E001 · 2026
Blackwood V; Stevens WR Jr; Jeans KA. Gait & Posture.
System: emed-x; emed-xl
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110204 · Primary source
How emed was used: Twenty-four included participants completed barefoot trials on both platforms; five one-foot trials per platform were averaged and regional contact area/time/mean force compared.
Publication date: 2026-07
E107 · 2026
Arens T; Sproll M; Hauschild A; Kniewasser C; Helfrich L; Kosch L; Zech A. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 19(3):e70207.
System: emed-n50
10.1002/jfa2.70207 · Primary source
How emed was used: The study acquired dynamic walking footprints at 50 Hz and averaged three valid trials per leg.
Publication date: 2026-09-15
E106 · 2026
Eren A; Gungor CI; Aral F; Oklaz EB; Akin B; Kanatli U. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 34(3):10225536261491553.
System: emed (hardware model not specified)
10.1177/10225536261491553 · Primary source
How emed was used: Forty-five adolescents with thoracic/thoracic-dominant scoliosis underwent barefoot emed walking assessment; five valid steps per foot were averaged.
Publication date: 2026-09-19
E108 · 2026
Zhong F; Pontin M; Zavatsky A; Maiolino P. Advanced Intelligent Systems 8(9):e70452.
System: emed-n50
10.1002/aisy.70452 · Primary source
How emed was used: Precollected user-specific barefoot emed-n50 maps informed smart-sole design and were compared with separate smart-shoe treadmill recordings; 26 plate steps versus 15 shoe steps.
Publication date: 2026-06-09
E002 · 2026
Telfer S; Wukelic C; Entress N; Ledoux WR. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.
System: emed (variant unspecified; 100 Hz)
10.1002/jfa2.70146 · Primary source
How emed was used: A floor-level emed platform recorded all four activities at 100 Hz; regional and spatial analyses were performed.
Publication date: 2026-03-19
E003 · 2026
Schleese L; Mittlmeier T; Fischer DC; Abshagen P; Opfermann J; Gahr P; Behrens M; Bruhn S; Weippert M. Journal of Clinical Medicine.
System: emed Q
10.3390/jcm15010100 · Primary source
How emed was used: The authors acquired dynamic footprints with an emed Q platform and compared its automated foot dimensions against manual examination and handheld 3D scans.
Publication date: 2025-12-23
E114 · 2026
Li W. Frontiers in physiology.
System: emed-x
10.3389/fphys.2026.1918241 · Primary source
How emed was used: The prospective cohort used an emed-x platform for repeated quiet-standing and sport-specific lunge trials, with pressure indices entered into ankle-instability prediction models.
Publication date: 2026-08-28
E004 · 2026
Heino D; Telfer S; et al.. Journal of Biomechanics.
System: emed platform; specific model not stated
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2026.113201 · Primary source
How emed was used: Emed at 4 sensels/cm² captured ten barefoot trials, five per foot; infrared gates kept speeds within 10% across trials and conditions.
Publication date: 2026-02-08
E115 · 2026
Doi H, Furuta N, Yoon H, Funato K. PloS one.
System: emed XL
10.1371/journal.pone.0349134 · Primary source
How emed was used: The investigators recorded walking pressure on an emed XL footplate and applied cluster-based spatial and temporal comparisons between sexes.
Publication date: 2026-05-15
E005 · 2025
Montagnani E; Morrison SC; Price C. PLOS ONE.
System: EMED xl; 100 Hz; 4 sensors/cm²
10.1371/journal.pone.0321632 · Primary source
How emed was used: The Great Foundations cohort supplied repeated recordings from 39 infants as new and confident walkers. The paper identifies EMED-xl collection at 100 Hz and selection/export of three steps per foot per stage.
Publication date: 2025-04-16
E116 · 2025
Eidmann A, Kraftborn K, Walcher MG, Fraißler L, Rudert M, Stratos I. Foot & ankle orthopaedics.
System: emed-c50
10.1177/24730114251338848 · Primary source
How emed was used: A 50-Hz capacitive emed-c50 platform on an 8-m walkway measured operated and contralateral feet.
Publication date: 2025-06-03
E006 · 2025
Behrendt A; Siebert T; D’Souza S. Journal of Children's Orthopaedics.
System: emed xl
10.1177/18632521251335875 · Primary source
How emed was used: Investigators performed clinical screening then acquired preferred-speed walkway pressures with EMED-xl at 100 Hz and 4 sensors/cm². After averaging six trials, one foot per child was randomly selected for age-group comparison.
Publication date: 2025-05-31
E007 · 2025
Haidar MN; Che-Ahmad A; Ayeop MAS; Ahmad-Ismani MS; Nik-Alyani NAA. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal.
System: EMED-q100
10.5704/MOJ.2511.001 · Primary source
How emed was used: Investigators recruited volunteers without relevant foot/spinal conditions, obtained walking pressure on the q 100 platform with EMED/E software at 100 Hz, and assessed peak values and their anatomical distribution.
Publication date: 2025
E110 · 2025
Quagliato L; Lim Y; Choi Y; Lee KM; Kim S; Lee T. Scientific Reports 15:2668.
System: Emed XL
10.1038/s41598-025-85688-7 · Primary source
How emed was used: The authors performed Emed XL static-pressure experiments on the same healthy subject used for the finite-element foot model and compared measured and predicted distributions.
Publication date: 2025-01-21
E117 · 2025
Milstrey A, Horst C, Gartung S, Weigel AS, Stange R, Ochman S. Journal of clinical medicine.
System: emed (model not specified); Pedar X for principal outcomes
10.3390/jcm14103384 · Primary source
How emed was used: Beyond the Pedar X comparisons, the authors explicitly performed a barefoot emed pressure-plate measurement to characterize each participant's foot geometry and loading.
Publication date: 2025-05-13
E008 · 2025
Latour E; Latour EE; Arlet J. Scientific Reports.
System: emed-m
10.1038/s41598-025-16428-0 · Primary source
How emed was used: The full methods identify emed-m with 3792 capacitive sensors and 4 sensors/cm². Each participant performed 100 measurements per foot, and extracted regional descriptors underwent variability analysis.
Publication date: 2025-08-26
E109 · 2025
Matov K; Bozděch M; Gimunová M; Komzák M; Dostál M; Maršálek M; Vespalec T; Mojžíš M; Vodička T. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 7:1569129.
System: emed XL
10.3389/fspor.2025.1569129 · Primary source
How emed was used: At least five valid footprints per foot were recorded at 100 Hz on an 8.5-m walkway.
Publication date: 2025-08-20
E009 · 2025
Hulshof CM; van Netten JJ; Busch-Westbroek TE; Sabelis LWE; Peters EJG; Pijnappels M; Bus SA. Diabetic Medicine.
System: emed-X
10.1111/dme.70099 · Primary source
How emed was used: Baseline barefoot pressures were acquired using emed-X; pedar-X separately measured in-shoe pressures.
Publication date: 2025-07-31
E010 · 2024
Brady LM; Wukelic C; Ledoux WR. Gait & Posture.
System: emed-X
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.04.015 · Primary source
How emed was used: Emed-X recorded static/dynamic pressure. Commercial 11-region automasks were compared with masks derived from segmented partial-weight-bearing CT scans and registered to pressure maps. Peak pressure, force-time integral, pressure-time integral and pressure-gradient measures were evaluated.
Publication date: 2024
E011 · 2024
Aydoğdu O; Erdoğan RU; Sarı Z; Polat MG. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences.
System: Novel emed (variant and actual study sampling frequency not specified)
10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1212317 · Primary source
How emed was used: Plantar pressure was assessed at baseline and after four weeks of interactive-floor training, with five trials per foot averaged. Fifteen sedentary participants completed the protocol.
Publication date: 2024-06-28
E118 · 2024
Jarl G, Hulshof CM, Tijhuis KA, Busch-Westbroek TE, Bus SA, van Netten JJ. Journal of foot and ankle research.
System: emed (variant unspecified)
10.1002/jfa2.70002 · Primary source
How emed was used: Four two-step pressure records per foot were acquired using emed; these baseline data entered adherence regression models.
Publication date: 2024-09-01
E012 · 2024
Kyung MG; Lee DO; Moon K; Yoon YS; Lee DY. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.
System: emed hardware, variant unspecified; 100 Hz. emed CL is named as analysis software, not a confirmed hardware model.
10.1177/10225536241258331 · Primary source
How emed was used: Clinical records of 20 unilateral plantar-fasciitis patients were analysed. Barefoot emed trials at 100 Hz were recorded, with the middle three of five trials averaged and four regional masks used.
Publication date: 2024-05-30
E119 · 2024
Askø Andersen J, Rasmussen A, Engberg S, Bencke J, Frimodt-Møller M, Kirketerp-Møller K, Rossing P. BMJ open diabetes research & care.
System: Emed (variant unspecified)
10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004398 · Primary source
How emed was used: A planned pressure substudy used an Emed plate at 4 sensors/cm². Participants struck it on their third step at normal walking speed, repeating until five valid trials per foot; blinded staff checked masks.
Publication date: 2024-12-03
E120 · 2024
Zhang L, Zhang Q, Zhong Y, Hortobagyi T, Gu Y. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology.
System: Emed pressure plate (model not specified)
10.3389/fbioe.2024.1387768 · Primary source
How emed was used: The authors collected static emed measurements on the modeled subject and used these as the experimental comparison for their foot finite-element analysis.
Publication date: 2024-07-08
E121 · 2024
Ferreira JSSP, Cruvinel-Júnior RH, da Silva EQ, Veríssimo JL, Monteiro RL, Duarte M, Giacomozzi C, Sacco ICN. Scientific reports.
System: emed-q100 / emed-q
10.1038/s41598-024-78188-7 · Primary source
How emed was used: The trial used an emed pressure plate for foot-muscle strength and a six-trial barefoot gait-pressure assessment with five anatomical masks.
Publication date: 2024-11-08
E112 · 2024
Origo D; Buffone F; Montini G; Belluto D; Tramontano M; Dal Farra F. Healthcare 12(8):814.
System: emed n50
10.3390/healthcare12080814 · Primary source
How emed was used: The study recorded complete walking footprints with emed n50 and processed them in emed Professional.
Publication date: 2024-04-10
E122 · 2024
Bus SA, Busch-Westbroek TE, Pulles J, van Dun T, Szabo G, Lacorte DH, Luckson D, van Netten JJ. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland).
System: emed-X
10.3390/s24175549 · Primary source
How emed was used: A 70-Hz emed-X platform acquired baseline walking pressures; regions were selected using ulcer history or high barefoot pressure.
Publication date: 2024-08-27
E123 · 2024
Latour E, Latour EE, Arlet J. Scientific reports.
System: emed-m
10.1038/s41598-024-53787-6 · Primary source
How emed was used: Emed-m at 100 Hz recorded repeated barefoot steps through a 5 m walkway. Force and contact-area indices were exported for ten masks and normalized to characterize regional weight transfer.
Publication date: 2024-03-11
E111 · 2024
Hulshof CM; Page M; van Baal SG; Bus SA; Fernando ME; van Gemert-Pijnen L; Kappert KDR; Lucadou-Wells S; Najafi B; van Netten JJ; Lazzarini PA. Sensors 24(8):2411.
System: EMED-X
10.3390/s24082411 · Primary source
How emed was used: The Netherlands cohort used EMED-X at 100 Hz and 4 sensors/cm², with a two-step approach and four trials per foot. Pedar-X measured in-device pressure and Australian regular-footwear pressure.
Publication date: 2024-04-10
E013 · 2023
Wysocka-Mincewicz M; Szczerbik E; Mazur M; Grabik M; Kalinowska M; Syczewska M. Biomedicines.
System: emed-X
10.3390/biomedicines11112901 · Primary source
How emed was used: Investigators recorded walking footprints using an emed-X, automatically masked them into anatomical regions, and compared results with manufacturer-provided adult reference data.
Publication date: 2023-10-26
E014 · 2023
Price C; Montagnani E; Nester C; Morrison SC. Scientific Reports.
System: Novel Emed-xl; 100 Hz; 4 sensors/cm²
10.1038/s41598-023-34568-z · Primary source
How emed was used: Twenty-five confidently walking infants were selected from a longitudinal cohort. An embedded emed-xl platform and synchronized video recorded self-directed walking, with straight and inward/outward turning steps extracted.
Publication date: 2023-05-16
E015 · 2023
Tang SFT; Tang ACW; Chen CK; et al.. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open.
System: Emed-X System / Emed-X400 platform
10.1097/GOX.0000000000005228 · Primary source
How emed was used: The authors used the model-X system with anX 400 platform (6080 sensors,4 sensors/cm²), recorded foot loading and used automatic masks with manual toe correction after transfer.
Publication date: 2023-09-01
E124 · 2023
Wang H, Wu Y, Liu J, Zhu X. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland).
System: emed-x
10.3390/bioengineering10101218 · Primary source
How emed was used: Investigators simultaneously collected insole and platform pressure at 100 Hz during balanced standing. Emed-x measured the blade-ground side, with protective EVA; these data checked the finite-element model.
Publication date: 2023-10-18
E016 · 2023
Montagnani E; Morrison SC; Price C. Gait & Posture.
System: EMED xl
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.03.006 · Primary source
How emed was used: Thirteen infants' emed-xl steps were analysed with standard and proportionally customized eight-region masks; pressure/area variation and mask-related data loss were compared.
Publication date: 2023-03-11
E125 · 2023
Monteiro RL, Drechsel TJ, Ferreira JSSP, Zippenfennig C, Sacco ICN. BMC musculoskeletal disorders.
System: emed-q100
10.1186/s12891-023-06851-7 · Primary source
How emed was used: An emed-q100 measured barefoot gait load on a six-metre walkway, with pressure outcomes regressed on sensory and plantar tissue measurements.
Publication date: 2023-09-06
E017 · 2023
Telfer S; Li EY. Scientific Reports.
System: emed; specific hardware variant not stated
10.1038/s41598-023-44041-6 · Primary source
How emed was used: The worked clinical analysis reuses five barefoot trials per foot from 16 participants with diabetic neuropathy. The primary Data paragraph explicitly identifies emed, and the paper compares pressuRe processing against commercial software.
Publication date: 2023-10-05
E126 · 2023
Elsayed W, Alotaibi S, Shaheen A, Farouk M, Farrag A. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.
System: EMED-X
10.23736/s1973-9087.23.07846-2 · Primary source
How emed was used: The trial collected three valid static/dynamic trials with an EMED-X embedded in a seven-metre walkway while testing an exercise-plus-orthosis intervention.
Publication date: 2023-03-29
E127 · 2022
Xu D, Zhou H, Zhang Q, Baker JS, Ugbolue UC, Radak Z, Ma X, Gusztav F, Wang M, Gu Y. Frontiers in veterinary science.
System: EMED-AT (as stated; do not infer another model from specifications)
10.3389/fvets.2022.1011357 · Primary source
How emed was used: The cat was acclimatised before repeated landings. EMED-AT at 100 Hz collected pressure-mat data at the three heights, while a separate Kistler task supplied force data. The paper reports 20 datasets per instrument and height.
Publication date: 2022-10-10
E128 · 2022
Xiang L, Gu Y, Mei Q, Wang A, Shim V, Fernandez J. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology.
System: emed (100 Hz; variant unspecified)
10.3389/fbioe.2022.843204 · Primary source
How emed was used: Four successful right-foot midgait trials per session were acquired with a 100-Hz emed plate on a 15-m path.
Publication date: 2022-03-23
E129 · 2022
Mens MA, van Netten JJ, Busch-Westbroek TE, Bus SA, Streekstra GJ, Wellenberg RHH, Maas M, Nieuwdorp M, Stufkens SAS. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.
System: EMED-X
10.1111/dme.14761 · Primary source
How emed was used: The consecutive clinical series measured barefoot toe loading using EMED-X before and shortly after surgery, alongside weight-bearing radiographs.
Publication date: 2021-12-16
E130 · 2022
Zhu T, Wang Y, Tian F, Wang W, Zhong R, Zhai H, Wang S. BMC musculoskeletal disorders.
System: Emed-x 400 (source typography: Emed® -× 400)
10.1186/s12891-022-05615-z · Primary source
How emed was used: The article reports recruiting patients and controls and measuring plantar pressure during walking with a 100-Hz Emed-x 400 platform, with regional pressure and contact variables calculated.
Publication date: 2022-07-12
E018 · 2022
Memar R; Farjad Pezeshk A; Ghasempour H. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation.
System: emed platform; hardware variant not specified
10.18502/jmr.v16i1.8561 · Primary source
How emed was used: Twenty-one middle-aged adults with leg-length discrepancy and ten controls walked on a 10-m walkway with an emed platform at its centre. Five valid trials per foot were acquired and three middle trials averaged.
Publication date: 2022-01-01
E131 · 2022
Kalender H, Uzuner K, Şimşek D, Bayram İ. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
System: emed-XL
10.5606/tftrd.2022.4904 · Primary source
How emed was used: The 100-Hz emed-XL platform acquired standing pressure data; repeated stances were averaged.
Publication date: 2022-03-01
E132 · 2022
Cruvinel-Júnior RH, Ferreira JSSP, Veríssimo JL, Monteiro RL, Suda EY, Silva ÉQ, Sacco ICN. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland).
System: emed-q100 for strength; emed-q for gait (source labels retained)
10.3390/s22249582 · Primary source
How emed was used: A pressure platform recorded maximal toe pressing and barefoot gait at 100 Hz. The paper averaged repeated bilateral trials and analyzed seven plantar regions alongside separate clinical and motion-capture outcomes.
Publication date: 2022-12-07
E133 · 2022
Song Y, Cen X, Zhang Y, Bíró I, Ji Y, Gu Y. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland).
System: Novel Emed (variant unspecified)
10.3390/bioengineering9100553 · Primary source
How emed was used: Measured pressures from the same participant were compared with the coupled model, separating four plantar regions from four sole regions. Emed supplied sole-pressure validation rather than in-shoe pressure.
Publication date: 2022-10-14
E134 · 2022
Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Huang J, Teo EC, Gu Y. Biology.
System: Emed (variant unspecified)
10.3390/biology11010127 · Primary source
How emed was used: The model provider stood on an Emed platform for five seconds. Measured peak pressure and distribution were compared with predictions before simulating 2,4 and 6 mmosteotomy displacement.
Publication date: 2022-01-13
E135 · 2022
Pol F, Khajooei Z, Hosseini SM, Taheri A, Forghany S, Menz HB. Journal of foot and ankle research.
System: EMED-le for gait; EMED family unspecified for arch/toe-strength tests
10.1186/s13047-022-00593-w · Primary source
How emed was used: Emed measured foot contact for arch index and maximal toe pressing; EMED-le recorded barefoot gait at comfortable speed. Regional loading and centre-of-pressure variables were calculated with Novel software.
Publication date: 2022-12-09
E136 · 2022
Monteiro RL, Ferreira JSSP, Silva ÉQ, Cruvinel-Júnior RH, Veríssimo JL, Bus SA, Sacco ICN. Scientific reports.
System: emed-q
10.1038/s41598-022-11745-0 · Primary source
How emed was used: The RCT specifically used an emed-q pressure platform to assess hallux and toe strength; walking speed and sensory outcomes were measured separately.
Publication date: 2022-05-09
E137 · 2022
Gimunová M, Kolářová K, Vodička T, Bozděch M, Zvonař M. PloS one.
System: emed (50 × 145 cm; variant unspecified)
10.1371/journal.pone.0273388 · Primary source
How emed was used: Toddlers walked barefoot naturally; five footprints per foot were retained at each session for emed geometry/loading analysis.
Publication date: 2022-08-23
E138 · 2022
Wagener N, Böhle S, Kirschberg J, Rohe S, Heinecke M, Di Fazio P, Matziolis G, Röhner E. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania).
System: emed c50
10.3390/medicina58060696 · Primary source
How emed was used: The study used emed c50 at 50 Hz for barefoot foot-pressure/rollover assessment alongside a separate motion-analysis setup.
Publication date: 2022-05-24
E019 · 2022
Nasuruddin H; Che-Ahmad A; Ayeop MAS; Nik Mohd Najmi NMF; Ahmad MW. IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia.
System: Emed-q100
10.31436/imjm.v21i3.1755 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary abstract reports emed-q100 measurements of 400 feet from adult Malay subjects and compares pressure outcomes by gender/BMI.
Publication date: 2022-07-01
E139 · 2022
Maharana P, Sonawane J, Belehalli P, Ananthasuresh GK. Wearable technologies.
System: Emed (variant unspecified;1760sensors,2/cm²,25Hz as reported)
10.1017/wtc.2022.2 · Primary source
How emed was used: The study collected neuropathy assessments and barefoot walking pressure using an Emed platform. It classified arch shape and compared regional peak loading between neuropathic and nonneuropathic groups.
Publication date: 2022-05-10
E140 · 2022
Kyung MG, Bak PR, Lim JW, Lee DO, Park GY, Lee DY. Journal of foot and ankle research.
System: emed n50
10.1186/s13047-022-00579-8 · Primary source
How emed was used: An embedded emed n50 acquired plantar loading during unloaded and loaded gait trials, with four regional masks.
Publication date: 2022-10-15
E141 · 2021
Ryman VFM, van der Esch M, Dekker J, Roorda LD, van Dieën J, Twisk JWR, Verberne SK, Huijbrechts E, Lems WF, van der Leeden M. Osteoarthritis and cartilage open.
System: EMED-nt
10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100134 · Primary source
How emed was used: The cohort examination included EMED-nt pressure recordings in a 3.6-m walkway to examine relationships with pain/activity limitations.
Publication date: 2021-01-06
E142 · 2021
Boryczka-Trefler A, Kalinowska M, Szczerbik E, Stępowska J, Łukaszewska A, Syczewska M. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland).
System: emed system (model not specified)
10.3390/diagnostics12010002 · Primary source
How emed was used: Plantar loads were captured with an emed platform and dynamic arch index defined the foot-type groups, compared with static ink-footprint classification.
Publication date: 2021-12-21
E020 · 2021
Keukenkamp R; Busch-Westbroek TE; Barn R; Woodburn J; Bus SA. Diabetic Medicine.
System: Emed-X
10.1111/dme.14438 · Primary source
How emed was used: Publisher full-text sections describe barefoot Emed-X recordings at100Hz using five two-step trials per foot; in-shoe measurements were separately acquired with Pedar-X.
Publication date: 2020-10-21
E021 · 2021
Montagnani E; Morrison SC; Varga M; Price C. Journal of Biomechanics.
System: EMED-xl
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110757 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary abstract explicitly describes12infants walking across EMED-xl, extracting footprints and registering pressure maps for pSPM comparison.
Publication date: 2021-09-22
E022 · 2021
Brierty A; Carty CP; Giacomozzi C; Phillips T; Walsh HPJ; Bade D; Horan S. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
System: EMED XL
10.1186/s12891-021-04364-9 · Primary source
How emed was used: Participants walked over an EMED XL while motion capture recorded foot markers, enabling analysis of regional pressure transfer during double support.
Publication date: 2021-06-07
E143 · 2021
Vogt B, Toporowski G, Gosheger G, Rölfing JD, Rosenbaum D, Schiedel F, Laufer A, Kleine-Koenig MT, Theil C, Roedl R, Frommer A. Children (Basel, Switzerland).
System: emed ST4
10.3390/children8050359 · Primary source
How emed was used: Five bilateral midgait trials on emed ST4 supplied dynamic loading measures before surgery and at follow-up.
Publication date: 2021-04-30
E144 · 2021
Shalamberidze M, Sokhadze Z, Tatvidze M. Computational and mathematical methods in medicine.
System: Emed-25 at/D (as printed)
10.1155/2021/9061241 · Primary source
How emed was used: Patients' pedography was acquired with a Novel Emed-25 at/D and used to trace local overpressure areas mathematically for CNC-milled insoles.
Publication date: 2021-08-06
E145 · 2021
Sichting F, Ebrecht F. PloS one.
System: emed n50
10.1371/journal.pone.0249965 · Primary source
How emed was used: An emed n50 monitored COP and provided visual feedback during static toe-dorsiflexion experiments, standardizing load location across participants.
Publication date: 2021-04-08
E146 · 2020
Štefan L, Kasović M, Zvonar M. PeerJ.
System: EMED–XL
10.7717/peerj.8551 · Primary source
How emed was used: Children walked over a calibrated EMED–XL platform at 100 Hz and 4 sensors/cm². Three bilateral trials supplied six plantar-loading variables, which were analyzed against PAQ-C physical activity.
Publication date: 2020-02-14
E147 · 2020
Belvedere C, Giacomozzi C, Carrara C, Lullini G, Caravaggi P, Berti L, Marchesini G, Baccolini L, Durante S, Leardini A. Journal of foot and ankle research.
System: emed q-100
10.1186/s13047-020-00431-x · Primary source
How emed was used: The study synchronized 100-Hz emed q-100 walking pressure with Vicon and anatomically masked averaged footprints.
Publication date: 2020-10-30
E148 · 2020
Hillstrom HJ, Soeters R, Miranda M, Backus SI, Hafer J, Gibbons M, Thaqi I, Lenhoff M, Hannan MT, Endo Y, Sculco T, Lane J. Archives of osteoporosis.
System: emed-X
10.1007/s11657-020-00814-4 · Primary source
How emed was used: Bilateral plantar pressures were acquired with emed-X during three 60-second bipedal trials at self-selected foot position; single-leg standing lasted up to 30 seconds. Baseline procedures were repeated at follow-up.
Publication date: 2020-10-03
E149 · 2020
Monteiro RL, Ferreira JSSP, Silva ÉQ, Donini A, Cruvinel-Júnior RH, Verissímo JL, Bus SA, Sacco ICN. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland).
System: emed q-100
10.3390/s20185129 · Primary source
How emed was used: The exercise trial used an emed q-100 both for maximal toe pressing and for regional walking pressure/force/time variables.
Publication date: 2020-09-09
E023 · 2020
Kasović M; Štefan L; Zvonár M. Scientific Reports.
System: EMED-XL
10.1038/s41598-020-66498-5 · Primary source
How emed was used: The investigators recorded children's walking footprints with a calibrated EMED-XL and constructed age- and sex-specific reference curves.
Publication date: 2020
E150 · 2020
McCahill JL, Stebbins J, Harlaar J, Prescott R, Theologis T, Lavy C. Bone & joint open.
System: EMED-M
10.1302/2633-1462.17.bjo-2020-0046.r1 · Primary source
How emed was used: The article describes 50-Hz EMED-M recordings in the clinical sample, with technical losses reducing the pressure datasets. Age/sex-stratified healthy pressure controls were reused from the gait laboratory's normal database.
Publication date: 2020-11-02
E024 · 2020
Yu P; Liang M; Ren F. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics.
System: emed (variant unspecified)
10.1155/2020/7610789 · Primary source
How emed was used: An emed plate measured static contact and four successful dynamic trials per foot on a 20-m runway.
Publication date: 2020
E025 · 2020
Zwaferink JBJ; Custers W; Paardekooper I; Berendsen HA; Bus SA. PLOS ONE.
System: emed-X
10.1371/journal.pone.0224010 · Primary source
How emed was used: Emed-X barefoot pressures supplied CADCAM isobars/cutout inputs and baseline risk-region definition.
Publication date: 2020-04-23
E151 · 2020
Naemi R, Chockalingam N, Lutale JK, Abbas ZG. BMJ open diabetes research & care.
System: EMED, variant unspecified
10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001122 · Primary source
How emed was used: Baseline Emed pressure was measured after familiarisation using a two-step walk. Three stance phases per foot were averaged, and bilateral values were combined for risk analyses.
Publication date: 2020-05-01
E152 · 2019
Huang P, Liang M, Ren F. Applied bionics and biomechanics.
System: emed (50 Hz; variant unspecified)
10.1155/2019/8082967 · Primary source
How emed was used: An emed platform embedded in an 8-m walkway captured repeated controlled-speed walking/running trials.
Publication date: 2019-01-02
E026 · 2019
Elvan A; Simsek IE; Cakiroglu MA; Angin S. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica.
System: EMED-m
10.1016/j.aott.2018.12.008 · Primary source
How emed was used: A two-step EMED-m walking protocol generated regional loading variables. Foot posture and quadriceps-angle measures were obtained, and one of each participant's feet was analysed to avoid treating two feet as independent.
Publication date: 2019
E153 · 2019
Apóstolo J, Dixe MDA, Bobrowicz-Campos E, Areosa T, Santos-Rocha R, Braúna M, Ribeiro J, Marques I, Freitas J, Almeida ML, Couto F. International journal of environmental research and public health.
System: EMED-X
10.3390/ijerph16173125 · Primary source
How emed was used: The trial explicitly used Novel EMED-X to assess baseline-to-postintervention gait force and pressure. Some participants could not complete the platform assessment, so Emed sample sizes were smaller than the overall trial.
Publication date: 2019-08-28
E027 · 2019
Martinez-Santos A; Preece S; Nester CJ. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.
System: Emed, variant unspecified (design input); Pedar-X separately measured in-shoe outcomes
10.1186/s13047-019-0344-z · Primary source
How emed was used: Standing Emed pressure and 3D foot shape were newly recorded to personalise nine insole designs. Walking pressure outcomes were acquired with Pedar-X, not the Emed platform.
Publication date: 2019-06-18
E154 · 2019
Ferreira JSSP, Panighel JP, Silva ÉQ, Monteiro RL, Cruvinel Júnior RH, Sacco ICN. Diabetology & metabolic syndrome.
System: emed q-100
10.1186/s13098-019-0487-x · Primary source
How emed was used: Three maximal toe-press efforts were recorded from a randomly chosen foot using emed q-100.
Publication date: 2019-10-30
E155 · 2019
Demirbüken İ, Özgül B, Timurtaş E, Yurdalan SU, Çekin MD, Polat MG. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.
System: emed-a 50/D
10.1016/j.aott.2019.01.006 · Primary source
How emed was used: Emed-a 50/D capacitive platform recorded self-selected midgait walking at 50/60 Hz.
Publication date: 2019-03-21
E156 · 2019
Wang M, Song Y, Valentin S, Baker JS, Gu Y. PeerJ.
System: EMED-AT (as reported)
10.7717/peerj.8007 · Primary source
How emed was used: An EMED-AT pressure mat collected landing kinetics; all paws had to land on the mat, and forces were normalized to bodyweight.
Publication date: 2019-11-12
E157 · 2019
Song Y, Wang M, Baker JS, Gu Y. PeerJ.
System: emed-m
10.7717/peerj.8186 · Primary source
How emed was used: A 0.395×0.24-m emed-m platform with 3792 sensors collected data at 50 Hz; Novel software analysed limb pressure/contact area and COP across neutral and lateral-head-position phases.
Publication date: 2019-12-12
E158 · 2018
Mei Q, Gu Y, Fernandez J. Scientific reports.
System: EMED, variant unspecified
10.1038/s41598-018-20648-y · Primary source
How emed was used: The same women completed longitudinal walking tests. A walkway-mounted Novel EMED platform acquired pressure at 100 Hz, partitioned into ten anatomical regions for pressure, area and centre-of-pressure analysis.
Publication date: 2018-02-02
E159 · 2018
Zhang Y, Awrejcewicz J, Baker JS, Gu Y. Frontiers in physiology.
System: emed (variant unspecified)
10.3389/fphys.2018.01434 · Primary source
How emed was used: The same participant stood on emed for five seconds; the middle three seconds were averaged for validation.
Publication date: 2018-10-11
E028 · 2018
Buldt AK; Forghany S; Landorf KB; Murley GS; Levinger P; Menz HB. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.
System: emed-x 400
10.1186/s13047-018-0245-6 · Primary source
How emed was used: After acclimatisation, participants performed two-step barefoot trials at comfortable speed. Five valid trials were analysed on a walkway-embedded emed-x 400 platform at 100 Hz.
Publication date: 2018
E160 · 2018
Chae YH, Kim JS, Kang Y, Kim HY, Yi TI. Annals of rehabilitation medicine.
System: emed (variant unspecified)
10.5535/arm.2018.42.2.222 · Primary source
How emed was used: Five walking trials were averaged per taping condition; randomized condition order reduced learning effects.
Publication date: 2018-04-30
E029 · 2018
Fang Q. Physical Activity and Health.
System: EMED pressure plate; model variant not specified
10.5334/paah.9 · Primary source
How emed was used: The published article's Procedure reports barefoot walking pressure acquisition at100Hz, seven dominant-foot trials, with peak pressure, contact area and pressure-time integral compared across seven regions.
Publication date: 2018-06-01
E161 · 2018
Nunn TR, Etsub M, Tilahun T, Gardner ROE, Allgar V, Wainwright AM, Lavy CBD. Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction.
System: EMED ST4
10.1007/s11751-018-0324-z · Primary source
How emed was used: EMED ST4 assessed the testing patients and a local normal-foot reference series using five walking records; pressure/area were compared with the new severity score.
Publication date: 2018-11-15
E162 · 2018
Ramalho F, Santos-Rocha R, Branco M, Moniz-Pereira V, André HI, Veloso AP, Carnide F. Clinical interventions in aging.
System: emed-x
10.2147/cia.s157224 · Primary source
How emed was used: An emed-x recorded barefoot self-paced walking in a ten-metre walkway before and after community exercise programs.
Publication date: 2018-04-06
E030 · 2018
Buldt AK; Forghany S; Landorf KB; Levinger P; Murley GS; Menz HB. Gait & Posture.
System: emed-x400
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.005 · Primary source
How emed was used: Primary abstract explicitly identifies emed-x400 barefoot walking in92healthy participants classified as normal, planus or cavus;11regions were used to calculate pressure, force, integrals and contact area.
Publication date: 2018-03-05
E163 · 2018
Holowka NB, Wallace IJ, Lieberman DE. Scientific reports.
System: emed q-100
10.1038/s41598-018-21916-7 · Primary source
How emed was used: Participants walked barefoot across a 100-Hz emed q-100 synchronized with high-speed video.
Publication date: 2018-02-27
E164 · 2018
Wallace IJ, Koch E, Holowka NB, Lieberman DE. Royal Society open science.
System: emed-q100
10.1098/rsos.180044 · Primary source
How emed was used: The study recorded participants crossing an emed-q100 barefoot and in sandals, retaining complete natural-gait contacts.
Publication date: 2018-03-14
E031 · 2018
Cheng YS; Reisdorf R; Vrieze A; Moran SL; Amadio PC; An KN; Zhao C. Journal of Biomechanics.
System: emed-xl
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.10.041 · Primary source
How emed was used: An emed-xl walkway (over 25,000 sensors, 1440×440-mm sensing area, 4/cm², 100 Hz) captured at least ten successful trials per condition. Five paw pads were masked to calculate vertical force, peak pressure, pressure-time integral and force timing.
Publication date: 2018
E165 · 2018
Latey PJ, Burns J, Nightingale EJ, Clarke JL, Hiller CE. Journal of foot and ankle research.
System: emed-AT/2
10.1186/s13047-018-0259-0 · Primary source
How emed was used: Participants pressed their great toes down during three 3–5-second contractions on emed-AT/2 at 25 Hz.
Publication date: 2018-06-07
E032 · 2017
Çetin E; Deveci MA; Songür M; Özer H; Turanlı S. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences.
System: EMED SF-2
10.3906/sag-1601-146 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary publisher abstract explicitly records EMEDSF-2 level-walking measurements in40ACL-deficient patients and40controls;13operated patients were reassessed.
Publication date: 2017-04-18
E033 · 2017
Hollander K; de Villiers JE; Sehner S; Wegscheider K; Braumann KM; Venter R; Zech A. Scientific Reports.
System: Emed n50
10.1038/s41598-017-07868-4 · Primary source
How emed was used: An Emed n50 embedded in a portable wooden walkway recorded footprints used to calculate dynamic morphology for the cross-national footwear-habit comparison.
Publication date: 2017-08-14
E034 · 2017
MacMahon A; Hillstrom HJ; Do HT; Chan JY; Deland JT; Ellis SJ. HSS Journal.
System: EMED-XT
10.1007/s11420-017-9542-z · Primary source
How emed was used: Primary full text describes EMED-XT standing trials and comfortable walking trials, three per foot, alongside separate supine measurements from a Pliance32-based device.
Publication date: 2017-02-28
E035 · 2017
Gurney JK; Kersting UG; Rosenbaum D; Dissanayake A; York S; Grech R; Ng A; Milne B; Stanley J; Sarfati D. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.
System: emed AT
10.1186/s13047-017-0205-6 · Primary source
How emed was used: Emed AT barefoot trials were actually performed on an 8-m runway; acquired trials were averaged and interpreted with participants.
Publication date: 2017-06-09
E166 · 2017
Siddle HJ, Hodgson RJ, Hensor EMA, Grainger AJ, Redmond AC, Wakefield RJ, Helliwell PS. BMC musculoskeletal disorders.
System: emed-SF
10.1186/s12891-017-1668-0 · Primary source
How emed was used: Three second-step barefoot records were averaged with patient-specific MTP masks using emed-SF.
Publication date: 2017-07-18
E036 · 2017
Tang ACW; Wu HM; Chen CK; Tang SFT. Rehabilitation Practice and Science.
System: Emed-X
10.6315/2017.45(2)02 · Primary source
How emed was used: The original publisher abstract explicitly describes Emed-X platform and Pedar in-shoe assessments of19flexible-flatfoot patients and15normal subjects.
Publication date: 2017
E167 · 2017
Kim T, Park JC. Medicine.
System: emed-q100
10.1097/md.0000000000008714 · Primary source
How emed was used: The authors acquired regional pressure on an emed-q100 within a ten-metre runway while comparing four randomized taping conditions.
Publication date: 2017-11-01
E037 · 2017
McKay MJ; Cartwright J; Ferreira P; Simic M; Vanicek N; Wojciechowski E; Mudge A; Burns J; 1000 Norms Project Consortium. Gait & Posture.
System: Emed platform; model variant not specified in available primary abstract
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.07.004 · Primary source
How emed was used: The original-paper abstract explicitly identifies barefoot data collection using the Zeno walkway and emed platform in1000healthy people aged3–101years.
Publication date: 2017
E038 · 2017
Telfer S; Woodburn J; Collier A; Cavanagh PR. Journal of Biomechanics.
System: emed pressure platform (variant unspecified)
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.028 · Primary source
How emed was used: The authors screened the >750-kPa forefoot inclusion criterion using an emed platform, collecting five trials per foot with a two-step protocol. Barefoot pressure, shape and ultrasound informed personalized insole designs. This is ancillary platform acquisition, not an insole-only study.
Publication date: 2017-07-26
E039 · 2016
Shu Y; Zhang Y; Fu L; Fekete G; Baker JS; Li J; Gu Y. SpringerPlus.
System: emed (50 Hz; variant unspecified)
10.1186/s40064-016-3682-3 · Primary source
How emed was used: Emed pressure acquisition at 50 Hz was synchronized with Vicon; right-foot take-off and landing were analyzed.
Publication date: 2016
E040 · 2016
Frigg A; Frigg R; Wiewiorski M; Goldoni J; Horisberger M. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.
System: Novel emed m/E
10.1186/s13047-016-0177-y · Primary source
How emed was used: Investigators recorded barefoot dynamic pedobarography with an emed m/E and constructed a relative midfoot index to summarize pathological loading.
Publication date: 2016
E041 · 2016
Aydos L; Kaya M; Kanatlı U; Yüksel MF; Uzun A. İnönü Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi.
System: EMED-SF
How emed was used: The original journal PDF Methods identify EMED-SF at71Hz and two sensors/cm², with one static and two dynamic barefoot recordings per foot and11regional contact-area/maximum-force masks.
Publication date: 2017-01-10
E168 · 2016
Merriwether EN, Hastings MK, Bohnert KL, Hollman JH, Strube MJ, Sinacore DR. Edorium journal of disability and rehabilitation.
System: EMED-ST-P-2
10.5348/d05-2016-7-oa-3 · Primary source
How emed was used: Participants completed two-step walking trials over a 3.6-m walkway at their chosen speed in preferred and straightened-foot conditions. EMED-ST-P-2 sampled at 50 Hz; three trials per foot and condition were averaged.
Publication date: 2016-03-26
E042 · 2016
Mueller S; Carlsohn A; Mueller J; Baur H; Mayer F. PLOS ONE.
System: emed X
10.1371/journal.pone.0149924 · Primary source
How emed was used: The study collected three to five barefoot right-foot trials at 100 Hz on a portable emed-X walkway.
Publication date: 2016-02-25
E169 · 2016
Wilkins RA, Siddle HJ, Redmond AC, Helliwell PS. Clinical rheumatology.
System: eMED SF
10.1007/s10067-016-3304-z · Primary source
How emed was used: Investigators collected three representative barefoot Emed-SF steps with a two-step start. Pedar measured footwear-interface pressure separately; GAITRite provided gait temporal/spatial variables.
Publication date: 2016-05-26
E170 · 2015
Sullivan J, Pappas E, Adams R, Crosbie J, Burns J. Journal of foot and ankle research.
System: Emed AT
10.1186/s13047-015-0102-9 · Primary source
How emed was used: A recruited sample attended one collection session. Barefoot pressure used Emed AT at 25 Hz with self-selected two-step walking; three valid trials were averaged and the heel subdivided into quadrants.
Publication date: 2015-08-18
E171 · 2015
Merker J, Hartmann M, Kreuzpointner F, Schwirtz A, Haas JP. Pediatric rheumatology online journal.
System: Novel Emed (model unspecified;4/cm²,100Hz)
10.1186/s12969-015-0022-z · Primary source
How emed was used: An Emed plate embedded in the walkway collected plantar pressures; five contacts per foot were averaged and used to calculate arch index.
Publication date: 2015-06-10
E043 · 2015
Sullivan J; Burns J; Adams R; Pappas E; Crosbie J. Gait & Posture.
System: Emed-AT
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.025 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary abstract explicitly states Emed-AT acquisition during normal walking in198people with plantar heel pain and70asymptomatic controls; force, pressure, integrals and timing were analyzed by foot region.
Publication date: 2015
E044 · 2015
Lu YC; Mei QC; Gu YD. BioMed Research International.
System: EMED, variant unspecified
10.1155/2015/326493 · Primary source
How emed was used: Participants walked at comfortable speed over a walkway-mounted EMED plate for six trials. The seven-region mean of repeated measurements was used for loading comparisons.
Publication date: 2015
E172 · 2015
Dalbeth N, Deacon M, Gamble GD, Mithraratne K, Fernandez J. RMD open.
System: Emed platform (model not specified)
10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000101 · Primary source
How emed was used: Participants walked over a 6,080-sensor Emed platform; measured loading drove individual computational foot-stress models compared with separate gout imaging patterns.
Publication date: 2015-08-13
E173 · 2014
Janssen DM, Sanders AP, Guldemond NA, Hermus J, Walenkamp GH, van Rhijn LW. Journal of foot and ankle research.
System: EMED SF-4
10.1186/1757-1146-7-33 · Primary source
How emed was used: The investigators acquired barefoot pressure footprints on an EMED SF-4 and derived hallux-valgus angle using geometry software for comparison with radiographs and goniometry.
Publication date: 2014-07-21
E174 · 2014
Siddle HJ, Hensor EM, Hodgson RJ, Grainger AJ, Redmond AC, Wakefield RJ, Helliwell PS. Rheumatology (Oxford, England).
System: emed pressure platform (model unspecified)
10.1093/rheumatology/ket478 · Primary source
How emed was used: The completed-study Results explicitly identify barefoot MTP pressure measurements with emed, although platform details are not in the main Methods section.
Publication date: 2014-01-29
E175 · 2014
Dalal K, Maran VB, Pandey RM, Tripathi M. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.
System: Emed-AT/2
10.1155/2014/843036 · Primary source
How emed was used: The authors state that defined finger pressure of 30–35 N/cm² was assessed and recorded using Emed-AT/2. They used that magnitude for tenderness assessment and caregiver reflexology stimulation. Physical arrangement of finger/foot/platform is not described.
Publication date: 2014-01-09
E176 · 2014
Khallaf ME, Gabr AM, Fayed EE. Neurology research international.
System: emed-q100
10.1155/2014/693048 · Primary source
How emed was used: A 100-Hz emed-q100 capacitive platform (6080 sensors; 4/cm²) recorded five valid affected-foot passes at usual walking speed after at least four approach steps. Visual pressure feedback was incorporated into the experimental rehabilitation.
Publication date: 2014-11-24
E177 · 2014
Kothari A, Stebbins J, Zavatsky AB, Theologis T. Journal of children's orthopaedics.
System: EMED-M
10.1007/s11832-014-0621-0 · Primary source
How emed was used: All children underwent EMED-M pressure-plate assessment alongside motion analysis, anthropometry and weight-bearing MRI. Non-correlated posture measures fed cluster analysis/logistic regression assigning flatfoot versus typical groups.
Publication date: 2014-11-08
E178 · 2014
Turner DE, Hyslop E, Barn R, McInnes IB, Steultjens MP, Woodburn J. Rheumatology (Oxford, England).
System: Emed X
10.1093/rheumatology/ket435 · Primary source
How emed was used: The clinical and ultrasound measures were collected in one session, and Emed X walking trials supplied mean metatarsal peak pressures for between-group and pain-prediction analyses.
Publication date: 2013-12-24
E179 · 2014
Skopljak A, Muftic M, Sukalo A, Masic I, Zunic L. Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH.
System: EMED platform (own-study model not specified)
10.5455/aim.2014.22.374-378 · Primary source
How emed was used: Methods identify a Novel EMED platform for the 45-person treatment subgroup, measured before and after custom-insole use; Results confirm a one-step acquisition approach.
Publication date: 2014-12-19
E180 · 2014
Ulbrecht JS, Hurley T, Mauger DT, Cavanagh PR. Diabetes care.
System: Novel emed D
10.2337/dc13-2956 · Primary source
How emed was used: Novel emed D quantified baseline barefoot pressure, using five-trial averages; pressure-based orthoses were manufactured from these contours.
Publication date: 2014-04-23
E045 · 2014
Waaijman R; de Haart M; Arts MLJ; Wever D; Verlouw AJWE; Nollet F; Bus SA. Diabetes Care.
System: Emed-X
10.2337/dc13-2470 · Primary source
How emed was used: Current indexed primary full-text Methods identify baseline barefoot Emed-X acquisition at50Hz and4sensors/cm², with at least four two-step trials per foot. Pedar-X supplied separate in-shoe follow-up measurements.
Publication date: 2014
E046 · 2013
Bennetts CJ; Owings TM; Erdemir A; Botek G; Cavanagh PR. Journal of Biomechanics.
System: EMED X, 100 Hz
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.09.007 · Primary source
How emed was used: The Cleveland Clinic database contained barefoot EMED X measurements on 819 feet from 438 people with diabetes at 100 Hz. Three first-step trials were averaged; seven regional peaks were clustered using k-means.
Publication date: 2013
E047 · 2013
Uzun A; Aydos L; Kaya M; Kanatlı U; Esen E. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi.
System: EMED-SF
How emed was used: EMED-SF at 71 Hz, 2 sensors/cm², on a 7×1-m wooden walkway; barefoot walking and 11-region masking.
Publication date: 2013-12-01
E048 · 2013
Bus SA; Waaijman R; Arts MLJ; et al.. Diabetes Care.
System: Emed-X
10.2337/dc13-0996 · Primary source
How emed was used: Baseline dynamic barefoot pressure was recorded with Emed-X, and five steps per foot were averaged; emed should not be confused with the in-shoe apparatus.
Publication date: 2013
E181 · 2013
Hendry GJ, Rafferty D, Barn R, Gardner-Medwin J, Turner DE, Woodburn J. Gait & posture.
System: Emed-X
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.10.009 · Primary source
How emed was used: Emed-X pressure recordings were obtained separately from Kistler force data; five barefoot two-step trials and automated regional masking were used.
Publication date: 2012-11-09
E049 · 2013
Melai T; Schaper NC; IJzerman TH; et al.. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.
System: emed-x (100Hz,4/cm²); emed-at (50Hz,2/cm²)
10.1186/1757-1146-6-41 · Primary source
How emed was used: Two centres used embedded emed-x or emed-at platforms; each participant stayed on the same platform throughout follow-up.
Publication date: 2013
E182 · 2013
Dalal K, Elanchezhiyan D, Das R, Dalal D, Pandey RM, Chatterjee S, Upadhyay AD, Maran VB, Chatterjee J. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.
System: Emed-AT/2
10.1155/2013/983769 · Primary source
How emed was used: The physical examination used finger pressure in a specified range, assessed with an Emed-AT/2 pedography system.
Publication date: 2013-03-11
E050 · 2013
Tong JWK; Kong PW. Gait & Posture.
System: Emed M
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.11.025 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary abstract explicitly reports Emed M static and dynamic bilateral footprint/loading recordings in 21 children on two separate days.
Publication date: 2013
E113 · 2013
Hafer JF; Lenhoff MW; Song J; Jordan JM; Hannan MT; Hillstrom HJ. Gait & Posture 38(3):544–548.
System: Two emed-x platforms
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.028 · Primary source
How emed was used: Twenty-two healthy adults completed ten right-foot walking trials on each of two emed-x and two MatScan platforms. The Methods explicitly identify the actual emed recordings and regional pressure analysis.
Publication date: 2013-02-28
E051 · 2012
Uzun A; Aydos L; Kaya M; Kanatlı U; Esen E. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi.
System: EMED-SF, 71 Hz as reported in the Methods
10.1501/Sporm_0000000228 · Primary source
How emed was used: The Turkish Methods and abstract identify actual barefoot EMED-SF acquisition in 22 male ice-hockey players and 25 male controls. Two dynamic records per foot and eleven masked regions were analysed.
Publication date: 2012-08-01
E183 · 2012
Dalal K, Elanchezhiyan D, Maran VB, Das RK, Kumar P, Singh SP, Murali Krishna C, Chatterjee J. Case reports in medicine.
System: emed-at/2
10.1155/2012/904729 · Primary source
How emed was used: The authors assessed the applied finger pressure using an emed-at/2 pedography system while examining foot skin regions.
Publication date: 2012-12-17
E052 · 2012
Müller S; Carlsohn A; Müller J; Baur H; Mayer F. Gait & Posture.
System: Novel Emed X, 100 Hz, 4 sensors/cm²
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.10.357 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary abstract explicitly identifies walking recordings with Emed X and reports 7,788 children included in analysis from 10,382 recruited.
Publication date: 2012
E053 · 2011
Aydos L. International Journal of Physical Sciences.
System: EMED-SF, 71 Hz as reported
10.5897/IJPS11.555 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary PDF describes barefoot EMED-SF recordings in 27 national wrestlers and 25 male controls at 71 Hz, with two dynamic measurements per foot and eleven anatomical regions.
Publication date: 2011-07-31
E054 · 2011
Ellis SJ; Stoecklein H; Yu JC; Syrkin G; Hillstrom HJ; Deland JT. HSS Journal.
System: EMED-X; EMED X/R software version 19.3.15
10.1007/s11420-010-9185-9 · Primary source
How emed was used: Static posture and dynamic gait data were acquired with an EMED-X sensory array, and Novel's ten-region automasking algorithm was applied to all trials.
Publication date: 2011
E055 · 2011
Rao S; Song J; Kraszewski A; et al.. Gait & Posture.
System: Emed (variant unspecified)
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.028 · Primary source
How emed was used: A flush floor-embedded Emed plate recorded barefoot mid-gait walking at self-selected speed after at least three approach steps. Standard hallux and first/second metatarsal masks supplied peak pressure, tested against foot structure and MTP flexibility.
Publication date: 2011
E056 · 2010
Maetzler M; Bochdansky T; Abboud RJ. Gait & Posture.
System: Emed ST2
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.023 · Primary source
How emed was used: The abstract identifies a completed Emed ST2 repeatability study in 23 healthy adults, with recordings on two occasions seven days apart.
Publication date: 2010
E057 · 2010
Rao S; Saltzman CL; Yack HJ. Gait & Posture.
System: EMed pedobarograph (variant unspecified)
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.016 · Primary source
How emed was used: A Novel EMed pedobarograph recorded plantar pressure at 50 Hz for five successful trials, alongside Optotrak kinematics and Kistler force data. Novel Win regional masks yielded peak pressure, pressure-time integral and loading timing.
Publication date: 2010
E184 · 2009
McPoil TG, Vicenzino B, Cornwall MW, Collins N. Journal of foot and ankle research.
System: EMED-X
10.1186/1757-1146-2-28 · Primary source
How emed was used: Participants were recruited and practised barefoot walking before five trials per foot on a 100-Hz EMED-X at the midpoint of a 12-m walkway. Anthropometric models predicted measured total and toe-excluded contact area.
Publication date: 2009-10-28
E058 · 2009
Gurney JK; Kersting UG; Rosenbaum D. Applied Ergonomics.
System: EMED-AT
10.1016/j.apergo.2008.11.001 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary abstract reports actual EMED-AT five-step walking measurements in 28 male elite rugby-league players, with five trials per foot.
Publication date: 2009
E059 · 2009
Bosch K; Nagel A; Weigend L; Rosenbaum D. Clinical Biomechanics.
System: emed pressure platform; model not specified in inspected journal abstract
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.06.001 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary journal abstract describes retrospective plantar-pressure analysis in 104 healthy people across four age groups, explicitly using an emed platform for the recorded loading variables.
Publication date: 2009
E060 · 2009
Barber Foss KD; Ford KR; Myer GD; Hewett TE. Journal of Athletic Training.
System: emed-x
10.4085/1062-6050-44.4.356 · Primary source
How emed was used: An emed-x platform was flush-mounted in a 6-m walkway; capacitive sensors at 4/cm² sampled at 100 Hz during self-selected walking.
Publication date: 2009
E061 · 2009
Sinclair MF; Bosch K; Rosenbaum D; Böhm S. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
System: EMED ST4
10.1007/s11999-009-0746-5 · Primary source
How emed was used: EMED ST4 recorded self-selected unaided walking at 50 Hz and 4 sensors/cm²; incomplete prints and double contacts were rejected.
Publication date: 2009
E062 · 2008
Gurney JK; Kersting UG; Rosenbaum D. Gait & Posture.
System: EMED AT, 50 Hz
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.002 · Primary source
How emed was used: Nine uninjured adults were tested on five separate days. The primary abstract explicitly states that the EMED AT platform at 50 Hz collected barefoot walking pressure patterns.
Publication date: 2008
E063 · 2008
Solano MP; Prieto LM; Varon JC; Moreno M; Boulton AJM. Diabetic Medicine.
System: EMED-SF-4
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02381.x · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary abstract identifies EMED-SF-4 measurements of regional peak pressure and pressure-time integrals in 79 people with diabetes and neuropathy plus 74 non-diabetic controls.
Publication date: 2008
E064 · 2008
Sinacore DR; Bohnert KL; Hastings MK; et al.. Clinical Biomechanics.
System: EMED-ST P-2
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.05.006 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary Methods abstract explicitly states that each participant underwent barefoot platform measurements, followed by completed findings; this is not a review or a passing equipment citation.
Publication date: 2008
E065 · 2008
Putti AB; Arnold GP; Cochrane LA; Abboud RJ. Gait & Posture.
System: Emed ST4
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.06.009 · Primary source
How emed was used: Empirical repeatability study of the named Emed ST4 with recruited participants, repeated measurements and quantitative outcomes. A methodological original paper is not a review.
Publication date: 2008
E066 · 2008
Guldemond NA; Leffers P; Walenkamp GHIM; Schaper NC; Sanders AP; Nieman FHM; van Rhijn LW. BMC Endocrine Disorders.
System: EMED SF-4
10.1186/1472-6823-8-16 · Primary source
How emed was used: EMED SF-4 recorded barefoot pressures with a one-step protocol, averaging five steps per foot. Radiographs and Novel clinics software delineated forefoot/hallux/metatarsal masks; bilateral values were averaged for regression.
Publication date: 2008
E067 · 2008
Kanatlı U; Yetkin H; Simsek A; Ozturk AM; Esen E; Besli K. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica.
System: EMED-SF
10.3944/aott.2008.026 · Primary source
How emed was used: Full primary experimental Methods and measured Results verify actual emed use, not a reference-list mention.
Publication date: 2008
E185 · 2007
Suckel A, Muller O, Herberts T, Wulker N. BMC musculoskeletal disorders.
System: EMED SF1
10.1186/1471-2474-8-80 · Primary source
How emed was used: Each foot was driven through a 60-second heel-contact-to-toe-off cycle on an EMED SF1 platform (50×30 cm; 1 sensor/cm²) mounted on the force/angle-controlled translation stage. Separate K-scan sensors recorded talonavicular/calcaneocuboid joint pressure.
Publication date: 2007-08-08
E068 · 2006
Orendurff MS; Rohr ES; Sangeorzan BJ; Weaver K; Czerniecki JM. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume.
System: Emed mat; exact model not specified in the accessible primary abstract
10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16807 · Primary source
How emed was used: Authors explicitly report that they measured participant forefoot pressure with an Emed mat and present the resulting analysis; not a review.
Publication date: 2006
E069 · 2006
Guldemond NA; Leffers P; Nieman FHM; Sanders AP; Schaper NC; Walenkamp GHIM. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
System: EMED SF-4
10.1186/1471-2474-7-93 · Primary source
How emed was used: EMED SF-4 pressure was acquired using a two-step protocol and averaged across five consecutive measurements per foot. Hallux/metatarsal masks were established with Novel software and checked using AP radiographs.
Publication date: 2006
E186 · 2006
Turner DE, Helliwell PS, Emery P, Woodburn J. BMC musculoskeletal disorders.
System: EMED-ST
10.1186/1471-2474-7-102 · Primary source
How emed was used: Dual-mounted Bertec force and EMED-ST pressure plates simultaneously recorded loading. Five-trial averages provided forefoot peak pressure, toe/midfoot contact area and time for COP to reach half-foot length.
Publication date: 2006-12-21
E070 · 2005
Bus SA; Maas M; de Lange A; Michels RPJ; Levi M. Journal of Biomechanics.
System: EMED pressure platform; exact model not specified in the accessible primary abstract
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.034 · Primary source
How emed was used: The original abstract names the platform in a performed measurement procedure and reports the acquired pressure outcomes; not a review or mere equipment citation.
Publication date: 2005
E071 · 2005
Burns J; Crosbie J; Hunt A; Ouvrier R. Clinical Biomechanics.
System: EMED-SF
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.03.006 · Primary source
How emed was used: Explicit performed EMED-SF measurements and resulting comparative data in an original paper; not a review.
Publication date: 2005
E072 · 2004
Tuna H; Yildiz M; Celtik C; Kokino S. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica.
System: Mini-Emed pedobarographic device
How emed was used: PubMed identifies a Journal Article and the primary abstract explicitly reports measurements on recruited participants using Mini-Emed; not a review.
Publication date: 2004
E073 · 2004
Taylor AJ; Menz HB; Keenan AM. The Foot.
System: EMED-SF
10.1016/j.foot.2003.09.004 · Primary source
How emed was used: The publisher's Methods abstract explicitly states measurements with the named system on recruited participants, with reported experimental results; not a review.
Publication date: 2004
E074 · 2004
Dowling AM; Steele JR; Baur LA. International Journal of Obesity.
System: AT-4 emed pressure platform
10.1038/sj.ijo.0802729 · Primary source
How emed was used: The publisher classifies this as a Paper, and its original abstract explicitly describes field-based data collection with AT-4 emed, participants and findings. Not a review.
Publication date: 2004-08-10
E075 · 2003
Kanatli U; Yetkin H; Bölükbaşi S. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.
System: EMED-SF
10.1007/s00402-002-0459-7 · Primary source
How emed was used: The publisher explicitly labels an Original Article and describes actual EMED-SF measurements with numerical findings; not a review.
Publication date: 2003
E076 · 2002
DeFrino PF; Brodsky JW; Pollo FE; Crenshaw SJ; Beischer AD. Foot & Ankle International.
System: EMED; exact model not specified in the accessible primary abstract
10.1177/107110070202300605 · Primary source
How emed was used: The publisher labels this a Research article, and the abstract explicitly describes EMED in the performed preoperative/postoperative procedures and results. Not a review.
Publication date: 2002
E077 · 2001
Hills AP; Hennig EM; McDonald M; Bar-Or O. International Journal of Obesity.
System: Emed F01
10.1038/sj.ijo.0801785 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary abstract explicitly names Emed F01 with 2 sensors/cm² for standing and walking measurements in 35 men and 35 women, divided into obese and non-obese groups.
Publication date: 2001-11-30
E078 · 2001
Russo SJ; Chipchase LS. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy.
System: Emed-AT-2
10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60271-3 · Primary source
How emed was used: Forty participants performed two sets of six walks on Emed-AT-2, barefoot and with low-Dye tape on the right foot; six plantar masks were analyzed.
Publication date: 2001
E079 · 2001
Kanatli U; Yetkin H; Simsek A; Besli K; Ozturk A. Foot & Ankle International.
System: EMED-SF
10.1177/107110070102200808 · Primary source
How emed was used: The original abstract describes radiographic heel-pad evaluation and EMED-SF plantar-pressure measurements in 47 normal subjects and 59 patients with heel pain.
Publication date: 2001
E080 · 2000
Bryant AR; Tinley P; Singer KP. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.
System: EMED-SF-4 version2.1 (primary publisher Methods excerpt); EMED-SF in abstract
10.7547/87507315-90-6-295 · Primary source
How emed was used: EMED-SF-4 version 2.1, 50 Hz, 2,736 sensors (4/cm²), three left-foot trials on a 10-m walkway.
Publication date: 2000-06-01
E081 · 1999
Bryant A; Singer K; Tinley P Foot & Ankle International.
System: EMED-SF
10.1177/107110079902001006 · Primary source
How emed was used: Ten normal subjects supplied contact area, contact time, maximum force and peak pressure at seven foot sites to compare two-step and midgait measurement reliability.
Publication date: 1999
E085 · 1999
Lung CW; Lo CY; Yang SW Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering.
System: EMED-SF
How emed was used: The university-hosted original article abstract states that EMED-SF recorded plantar pressures during different turning motions.
Publication date: 1999
E082 · 1999
Bryant A; Tinley P; Singer K The Foot.
System: EMED-SF
10.1054/foot.1999.0538 · Primary source
How emed was used: The original article compares dynamic pressure measurements in 30 control, 30 hallux-valgus and 30 hallux-limitus subjects, acquired using EMED-SF and two-step collection.
Publication date: 1999
E084 · 1999
Hayafune N; Hayafune Y; Jacob HAC The Foot.
System: EMED-SF4
10.1054/foot.1999.0518 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary abstract explicitly reports push-off plantar-pressure recording with EMED-SF4 in 42 healthy subjects, 84 feet, and regional forces calculated from the pressure measurements.
Publication date: 1999
E083 · 1999
Bryant AR; Singer KP; Tinley P Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.
System: EMED-SF
10.7547/87507315-89-7-358 · Primary source
How emed was used: Raised-walkway EMED-SF, two-step method, three comparable trials per foot and regional masking before/after surgery.
Publication date: 1999
E086 · 1999
McPoil TG; Cornwall MW; Dupuis L; Cornwell M Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.
System: EMED-SF
10.7547/87507315-89-10-495 · Primary source
How emed was used: EMED-SF: 1,944 sensors, 2/cm², 70 Hz, embedded in a 12-m walkway; 20 two-step and 20 midgait right-foot trials.
Publication date: 1999
E087 · 1998
Armstrong DG; Peters EJ; Athanasiou KA; Lavery LA The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery.
System: EMED gait analysis system; specific model not given
10.1016/S1067-2516(98)80066-5 · Primary source
How emed was used: The original case-control study enrolled 219 diabetic patients and analyzed all participants' peak plantar pressures using EMED; receiver-operating-characteristic analysis evaluated ulcer screening.
Publication date: 1998
E088 · 1998
Nyska M; Liberson A; McCabe C; Linge K; Klenerman L Foot and Ankle Surgery.
System: EMED; specific model not given
10.1046/j.1460-9584.1998.00068.x · Primary source
How emed was used: The original prospective study evaluated 17 hallux-valgus patients (29 feet) after distal soft-tissue correction and proximal osteotomy and explicitly used EMED for plantar-pressure functional evaluation.
Publication date: 1998
E091 · 1997
Widhe T Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics.
System: EMED; specific model not given
How emed was used: The primary abstract explicitly reports a prospective cohort initially containing 2,401 newborns, with children having congenital deformities and a random normal-foot comparison sample examined using dynamic EMED pressure analysis at age 16. It does not say all 2,401 underwent EMED recording.
Publication date: 1997
E089 · 1997
Nyska M; Sofer D; Porat A; Howard CB; Levi A; Meizner I Israel Journal of Medical Sciences.
System: EMED-SF
How emed was used: EMED-SF (2016sensors,2/cm²) embedded in5mwalkway recorded static and dynamic barefoot pressures.
Publication date: 1997
E090 · 1997
Stess RM; Jensen SR; Mirmiran R Diabetes Care.
System: EMED-SF
10.2337/diacare.20.5.855 · Primary source
How emed was used: The primary abstract describes 97 diabetic participants whose normalized peak pressure, pressure-time integral and force-time integral were measured in each foot using EMED-SF.
Publication date: 1997
E092 · 1995
Quaney B; Meyer K; Cornwall MW; McPoil TG Foot & Ankle International.
System: EMED SF
10.1177/107110079501600909 · Primary source
How emed was used: Twenty-one adults walked barefoot over the EMED SF and Dynamic Pedobarograph using a two-step protocol. Regional plantar peaks and vertical forces were measured using both systems.
Publication date: 1995
E094 · 1994
Phillipson A; Dhar S; Linge K; McCabe C; Klenerman L Foot & Ankle International.
System: EMED F
10.1177/107110079401501104 · Primary source
How emed was used: Fifteen patients representing 23 feet had foot-pressure measurements before and after forefoot arthroplasty using EMED F.
Publication date: 1994
E093 · 1994
Lundeen S; Lundquist K; Cornwall MW; McPoil TG Foot & Ankle International.
System: EMED-SF
10.1177/107110079401500607 · Primary source
How emed was used: Twelve volunteers completed level walking, stair ascent/descent and two pivoting conditions barefoot on an EMED-SF platform.
Publication date: 1994
E095 · 1993
Hughes J; Clark P; Linge K; Klenerman L Foot & Ankle.
System: EMED F
10.1177/107110079301400905 · Primary source
How emed was used: The report compares an earlier Dynamic Pedobarograph dataset with a second study repeating the protocol using EMED F. Actual EMED F acquisition is described, not simply a literature discussion.
Publication date: 1993 Nov-Dec
E098 · 1992
Sanfilippo PB II; Stess RM; Moss KM Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.
System: EMED-SF
10.7547/87507315-82-10-507 · Primary source
How emed was used: Human walking measurements compared five common insole materials and no interface material on the EMED-SF plate. Variables included vertical force, integrals, peak pressure and contact area.
Publication date: 1992
E097 · 1992
Proano E; Määttänen H; Perbeck L; Solders G; Turan I Diabetic Medicine.
System: EMED Gait Analysis System; specific model not stated
10.1111/j.1464-5491.1992.tb01880.x · Primary source
How emed was used: Ten neuropathic diabetic patients and eight controls underwent EMED gait analysis alongside fluorescein flowmetry measurements of plantar skin circulation.
Publication date: 1992
E096 · 1992
Engsberg JR; Tedford KG; Springer MJ; Harder JA Prosthetics and Orthotics International.
System: EMED by NOVEL GmbH (model unspecified)
10.3109/03093649209164341 · Primary source
How emed was used: Each child stood on EMED; regional mean pressures yielded force/bodyweight and forefoot/whole-foot ratios.
Publication date: 1992
E103 · 1991
Wolfe L; Stess RM; Graf PM Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.
System: EMED SF
10.7547/87507315-81-6-281 · Primary source
How emed was used: The authors explicitly report dynamic pressure analysis of Charcot foot using the EMED SF system.
Publication date: 1991
E099 · 1991
Blomgren M; Turan I; Agadir M The Journal of Foot Surgery.
System: EMED Gait Analysis System; specific model not stated
How emed was used: The original abstract describes plantar pressure-zone analysis in 66 hallux-valgus patients and 60 normal subjects using EMED.
Publication date: 1991
E100 · 1991
Engsberg JR; Aldridge KC; Harder JA Prosthetics and Orthotics International.
System: EMED pressure system (model unspecified)
10.3109/03093649109164286 · Primary source
How emed was used: EMED ground pressure was combined with two-camera spatial data to estimate knee/hip intersegmental forces.
Publication date: 1991
E102 · 1991
Samnegard E; Turan I; Lanshammar H The Journal of Foot Surgery.
System: EMED gait analysis system; specific model not stated
How emed was used: Ten first-MTP arthrodesis patients and ten Keller arthroplasty patients had plantar pressure distribution measured with EMED during walking.
Publication date: 1991
E101 · 1991
Hughes J; Pratt L; Linge K; Clark P; Klenerman L Clinical Biomechanics.
System: EMED F
10.1016/0268-0033(91)90036-P · Primary source
How emed was used: EMED F recordings comprised 25 walks by each of ten volunteers at three walking speeds.
Publication date: 1991
E104 · 1990
Samnegård E; Turan I; Lanshammar H The Journal of Foot Surgery.
System: EMED gait analysis system; specific model not stated
How emed was used: Ten seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients, on average four years after foot surgery, underwent EMED gait analysis and were compared with ten controls.
Publication date: 1990
E105 · 1989
Engsberg JR; Allinger TL; Harder JA Prosthetics and Orthotics International.
System: EMED pressure system (model unspecified)
10.3109/03093648909079425 · Primary source
How emed was used: EMED with 0.5 cm² cells recorded ground-shoe standing pressure; trial mean pressures converted into regional loads.
Publication date: 1989
Update cookies preferences
